Now you see it, now you don’t: How EFSA and BfR reached a different decision than the IARC Working Group on glyphosate.
Presentation by CSS member Prof. Dr. Christopher Portier, Senior Collaborating Scientist with the Environmental defense Fund and former member of numerous WHO/IARC scientific committees.
The European Network of Scientists for Social and Environmental Sustainability (ENSSER) & the Federation of German Scientists present the Post-Neonicotinoid-Symposium
The Symposium takes place on 1st of December at Festsaal der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Luisenstraße 56, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
You find the program and form of registration at the ENSSER website.
Neonicotinoids: DDT from the 21st century?
Radio Interview with CSS member Prof. Edward A. D. Mitchell
03 October 2015
Since the mid-1990s, agriculture has experienced a quiet revolution: neonicotinoids. Plants sprayed with neonicotinoids incorporate the toxic substance and become toxic to insects themselves.
2015 Whistleblower Award
Prof. Dr. Gilles-Eric Séralini receives Whistleblower Award 2015 for public disclosure of risks to life and health
The Federation of German Scientists (VDW - Federation of German Scientists) and the German Section of the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA) present the 2015 Whistleblower Award equally to the molecular biologists Prof. Dr. Gilles-Eric Séralini from the University of Caen (Normandy, France) and the former US drone pilot Brandon Bryant.
The awards will be presented on
Friday, 16 October 2015, at 7:30 pm
in the Bürgersaal of Karlsrue City Hall.
In 2012, Prof. Dr. Gilles-Eric Séralini and colleagues published a long-term feeding study with rats, showing toxic and carcinogenic effects of the glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup and genetically engineered Roundup tolerant maize, in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology (Elsevier). Subsequently the publication was highly criticised and attacked and ultimately led Elsevier to withdraw the paper on grounds of "inconclusiveness". This meant that the data was no longer to be cited. According to the Committee on Publication Ethids (COPE) this procedure violates the international publishing ethics: Withdrawing papers and the data they contain is only justifiedin cases of severe offences such as demonstrable falsification or manipulation, "honest error" or plagiarsm. In 2014, another peer-reviewed journal, Environmental Sciences Europe (Springer) re-published the paper.
Details about the Whistleblower Award Presentation 2015 and reasoning of the jury can be found here.